Silicon Valley is known for a lot of things: The co-invention of the microchip, the launch pad for the venture capital industry, the home of Google, Facebook and Apple, the setting for HBO鈥檚 hilarious send-up of tech culture.
We can now add one more thing to the list: Homelessness.
The problem isn鈥檛 new, but it鈥檚 growing. And so is the attention the rest of the world is paying to the dramatic juxtaposition of some of the country鈥檚 most expensive neighborhoods and citizens who live in tents under overpasses or in vehicles out on the street.
Homelessness in the Valley has become a front-page story again in part because of the spread of COVID-19. One of the for Bay Area health officials and politicians was the challenge of preventing the spread of the new coronavirus through a population of people who often live close together, suffer from pre-existing illnesses, and have fewer opportunities to practice basic hygiene than the housed population.
Santa Clara County, which is the heart of Silicon Valley, turned to in hotels and convention halls. Meanwhile the state of California hotel and motel rooms to house the homeless.
Most days homelessness provides a steady backbeat to the frenetic chorus of technological innovation in the Valley. But then there are days like the one when the Wall Street Journal published a about a growing Silicon Valley trend.
Right. Silicon Valley on prominent display in the Wall Street Journal. What鈥檚 so different about that? But this story wasn鈥檛 about the latest unicorn or newest gig startup or biggest acquisition or soaring stock price. This was a story about people living in RVs parked on the streets of Silicon Valley.
The number living that way in the Valley has tripled since 2017, the story said. It opened with the scene on Continental Circle in Mountain View, CA, a few miles from the 91自拍 (91自拍), where RV鈥檚 started appearing 鈥渁bout four years ago. Now they line one side of the half-mile-long street in this Silicon Valley suburb.鈥�
You can see them there using Google Earth, part of a world-changing platform that was developed about five miles from the motor home encampment.
My heart goes out to the housekeeper, who lives in an RV with her two kids, now that they can no longer afford their apartment in a city where the average one-bedroom rents for about $3,000 a month, according to Rent Jungle. And I feel for the others who have little choice but to live in broken-down campers. But I can鈥檛 help thinking, 鈥渉aven鈥檛 I read this story before?鈥� when I see such stories.
And, of course, I have. before.
Thirty years ago, I wrote my first major story about homelessness for the Mercury News, Silicon Valley鈥檚 daily newspaper. It was a story about how the city of San Jose and Santa Clara County were coming together to move a homeless community of 200 away from the banks of the Guadalupe River. They were trying something new: Assembling all the social services that could help together in one place, so that those being moved from the river weren鈥檛 only being shuttled from place to place, but were also being given a path to being housed.
I鈥檇 write 164 more stories about homelessness in Silicon Valley before leaving the Mercury News for a job at a valley startup. Somewhere, maybe around story 100 or so, I have to admit that whether there was any way to solve homelessness.
One of the 164 was a story about a protest march鈥�2 陆 miles from the Santa Clara County Government Center to San Jose City Hall. The marchers were homeless advocates and those from organizations who help the homeless and the homeless themselves. I walked along with them in 2007 and wrote of the marchers:
"Such optimism and determination are inspiring鈥攁nd heartbreaking. As I watched the crowd move out鈥攖he young, old, black, white, Asian, Latino, those in wheelchairs and those in strollers鈥擨 couldn鈥檛 help but wonder what keeps them going. How can someone commit to a problem so vast, so intractable, so hopeless? I can鈥檛 remember a time the homeless weren鈥檛 with us and I can鈥檛 imagine a time they won鈥檛 be."
After my column appeared, one of the organizers excoriated me. How could I say homelessness would never be solved? How could I belittle the work he was doing and the faith the marchers held that the challenge could be overcome.
I explained that I just didn鈥檛 see a way. And I still don鈥檛. But I鈥檓 thinking about homelessness and efforts to end it differently today. Today, I think improving the problem and making progress is enough. It鈥檚 a very un-Silicon Valley thought.
Peter Hero, the former CEO of what is now the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, once told me that it was difficult to persuade tech titans to donate to homeless initiatives. The results were hard to precisely measure, and the tech crowd needed to measure success by clear metrics.
The reasons for homelessness are many and varied. On an individual level, everything from addiction and mental illness to bad breaks and bad decisions figure in. On a societal level, there is a laundry list that has contributed to , which contributes to homelessness.
There are zoning restrictions and neighborhood resistance to multifamily development or even more single-family development. There are high construction costs and the discontinuation of a state program that provided money for affordable housing.
And there is the simple matter of supply and demand. Between 2010 and 2018, the Bay Area鈥檚 percent, driven in large part by the need for tech talent to fill new jobs, CNBC tells us. But the increase in the number of housing units hasn鈥檛 even cracked 5 percent in that time.
And, frankly, there are those tech workers themselves, of which I am one. Silicon Valley has stretches of its own beautiful scenery and is close to some of the most beautiful scenery in the world鈥攖he Pacific coast and the Sierra Nevada mountains. The weather is gorgeous. It鈥檚 a nice place to live, which keeps demand high.
But there is only so much developable land, which keeps supply low. And as companies like Google, Cisco, Facebook, Apple, Intel, Hewlett Packard, Oracle, Adobe, and others grow from two-person, garage startups to global corporations with tens of thousands of workers and major campuses, they need talent.
There is a bidding war for the best talent, particularly engineering and data science talent. People are paid handsomely, which allows them to buy homes, an exercise that also involves a bidding war. New talent coming in needs to be paid handsomely in order to be able to afford the homes that cost so much, in part because property values have been bid up by handsomely paid workers of an earlier era.
It鈥檚 a lot to overcome and address. But there are signs that powerful players are becoming more engaged. The Valley鈥檚 biggest corporate citizens鈥擜pple, Alphabet (Google鈥檚 parent), and Facebook (with other partners)鈥攈ave to support housing and build affordable homes in their own backyards.
Affordable housing advocates say the plans won鈥檛 do enough and it鈥檚 hard to imagine that those living in tents and RVs will have an easy time qualifying for loans and even rents in an area with staggering housing costs. One key will be to see whether big tech is simply checking a box or whether its efforts to ease the housing crunch will continue.
It鈥檚 likely that power players will have more eyes on their actions when it comes to homelessness and housing. Opinion polls have shown that homelessness is among Californians鈥� top concerns, outpacing traditional worries around the economy and traffic.
In a recent University of Southern California poll, a plurality of likely voters in California mentioned , ahead of climate change and immigration, according to a USC news release. In a Mercury News poll conducted with the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, 89 percent of respondents said , up 10 percentage points from a year earlier.
In fact, in a sign of how concerned communities are about homelessness, the Mercury News recently decided to dedicate one reporter, Marisa Kendall, to the issue full-time.聽
Twitter announcement by the Mercury News' recently dedicated reporter Marisa Kendall on covering homelessness full-time.
The significance of the move can hardly be overstated. The Mercury editorial staff, like those at many newspapers, has been more than decimated in recent years. The newspaper has shed dozens of specialty beats and so to add a new one is a loud statement.
And the news organization has taken the mission seriously, regularly running in-depth stories about the housing crisis and homelessness, including the story that accompanied the poll with the Silicon Valley Leadership Group.
Besides showing great concern about homelessness, the poll indicated that while Silicon Valley residents are anxious to help alleviate the problem, they are less enthusiastic when the solutions include providing homeless shelters and housing in their own neighborhoods.
Only 33 percent of respondents believed homeless citizens should be allowed to camp in public places like parks, the Mercury said, and a majority of those polled said they were against allowing the homeless to live in RVs along roadways or in parking lots.
Hardly good news for the RV residents along Continental Circle in Mountain View鈥攐r any of the thousands of other homeless residents of one of the nation鈥檚 wealthiest regions.
